Faith Nyasuguta
The United States is reshaping its relationship with Africa, trading traditional aid packages for a strategy centered on investment, trade and large-scale infrastructure, as global powers intensify competition for influence across the continent.
In a marked departure from decades of development assistance-led engagement, Washington is now prioritising private capital, commercial partnerships and long-term financing tools to deepen ties with African economies. The new approach reflects a belief that economic cooperation and business opportunities – rather than donor support – will define the next phase of Africa-US relations.
At the heart of this recalibration is the creation of a Strategic Infrastructure and Investment Working Group, formed jointly by the United States and the African Union. The framework was agreed following high-level talks in Addis Ababa between US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau and African Union Commission Chairperson Mahmoud Ali Youssouf.
Both sides say the initiative will focus on accelerating projects that directly support Africa’s development ambitions, while opening the door for stronger US private-sector participation.
The working group is designed to serve as a coordination hub linking policymakers, investors and technical experts. Its mandate includes identifying commercially viable projects and mobilising financing for sectors considered critical to economic growth – from transport corridors and power systems to digital infrastructure and regulatory reforms.
Officials involved in the talks argue that influence in Africa is increasingly tied to who can deliver tangible growth through roads, ports, energy networks and modern technology systems. In that sense, infrastructure has become not just an economic need, but a strategic battleground.
The framework is aligned with key African priorities, including the African Union’s Agenda 2063 development blueprint, the Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA), and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). By syncing US resources with these home-grown strategies, Washington hopes to present itself as a partner supporting African-led goals rather than imposing outside agendas.
This shift comes at a time when many African countries are rethinking how they finance development. Heavy borrowing for infrastructure has strained public finances in several nations, prompting governments to look for more sustainable funding options. The US sees an opportunity to offer alternatives built around private investment and market-driven models instead of large sovereign loans.
American officials also acknowledge that the move is partly strategic. Rival powers, notably China and Russia, have expanded their footprint in Africa through construction contracts, energy deals and security partnerships. By contrast, Washington aims to compete through business engagement, technology transfer and supply chain integration.
Key focus areas include strengthening logistics networks, supporting clean and reliable energy systems, securing digital infrastructure, and building supply chains for critical minerals used in advanced technologies. Improving these sectors, analysts say, could lower trade costs, unlock regional markets and help the AfCFTA operate more effectively.
For African governments, the investment-first approach offers the prospect of attracting capital without deepening debt burdens, while accelerating industrialisation and job creation. For US firms, it opens access to fast-growing consumer markets and emerging opportunities in manufacturing, energy and technology.
Ultimately, the strategy signals a broader philosophical change: Africa is no longer viewed primarily as a recipient of assistance, but as an economic partner with strategic value. By placing investment and shared prosperity at the centre of engagement, Washington hopes to remain relevant in a continent that is becoming increasingly central to global growth and geopolitics.
As competition for influence intensifies, the message from the United States is clear – the future of its Africa policy will be written in deals, not donations.
RELATED:
