Faith Nyasuguta
In a historic and unprecedented move, Kenya’s Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has been impeached, marking the first time in the nation’s history that a deputy president has been removed from office. The impeachment process, which culminated in a Senate vote, has been a dramatic and contentious affair, reflecting deep political divisions within the country.
The motion to impeach Gachagua was initiated by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, who tabled the motion in the National Assembly. The motion cited 11 charges against Gachagua, including gross violation of the constitution, corruption, inciting ethnic divisions, and undermining the government. The National Assembly voted overwhelmingly in favor of the impeachment motion, with 281 MPs supporting the ouster and only 44 opposing it. One MP abstained from voting.
The charges against Gachagua were serious and multifaceted. Among the most significant were allegations of corruption and misuse of public funds. Gachagua was accused of using his position to enrich himself and his associates, engaging in corrupt practices that undermined public trust in the government. Additionally, he was charged with inciting ethnic divisions, a particularly sensitive issue in Kenya, where ethnic tensions have historically led to violence and unrest.
The impeachment process moved to the Senate, where Gachagua’s fate was to be decided. The Senate hearings were intense and highly publicized, with both supporters and opponents of Gachagua presenting their cases. Gachagua himself was unable to attend the hearings due to health issues, with his lawyer requesting a postponement on the grounds that Gachagua was suffering from chest pains and being treated at The Karen Hospital. Despite his absence, the Senate proceeded with the hearings.
After two days of deliberations, the Senate voted to uphold the impeachment charges against Gachagua. Out of 66 senators, 53 voted in favor of the impeachment, while the remaining senators either opposed or abstained. The decision was based on the evidence presented, which the majority of senators found compelling enough to warrant Gachagua’s removal from office.
The impeachment of Gachagua has sparked a wide range of reactions across Kenya. Supporters of the impeachment argue that it was a necessary step to uphold the rule of law and combat corruption at the highest levels of government. They believe that Gachagua’s removal sends a strong message that no one is above the law and that public officials must be held accountable for their actions.
Critics, however, view the impeachment as a politically motivated move aimed at weakening President William Ruto’s administration. They argue that the charges against Gachagua were exaggerated and that the impeachment process was rushed and lacked due process. Some have expressed concerns that the impeachment could further polarize the country and exacerbate existing political tensions.
The international community has also weighed in on the impeachment, with various organizations and foreign governments calling for a peaceful and orderly transition. The United Nations and the African Union have both emphasized the importance of upholding democratic principles and ensuring that the rule of law is respected.
As the dust settles, the focus now shifts to the future of Kenya’s politics. President Ruto will need to nominate a new deputy president, a decision that will have significant implications for his administration and the country’s stability. The impeachment of Gachagua serves as a reminder of the challenges of governance where political dynamics are often fluid and unpredictable.
For Gachagua, the impeachment marks a dramatic fall from grace. Once a key figure in Ruto’s administration, he now faces an uncertain future. His supporters remain hopeful that he will be able to clear his name and make a political comeback, while his detractors believe that his removal is a step towards greater accountability and transparency in government.
RELATED:
